home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- bart.starnet.com = 198.211.81.31
-
- Dick Montgomery
- StarNet Communications
- From news@bigblue.oit.unc.edu Sun Apr 6 05:58:16 1994
- Received: from bigblue.oit.unc.edu by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
- id AA23799; Sat, 16 Apr 1994 19:43:44 -0400
- Received: by bigblue.oit.unc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
- id AA25926; Sat, 16 Apr 1994 18:16:22 -0500
- Received: from GATEWAY by bigblue with netnews
- for winsock@sunsite.unc.edu (winsock@sunsite.unc.edu)
- To: winsock@sunsite.unc.edu
- Date: 6 Apr 1994 05:58:16 GMT
- From: clive@cs.uq.oz.au (Clive Mason)
- Message-Id: <2ntj1o$cmo@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au>
- Organization: Computer Science Dept, University of Queensland
- Sender: ses
- Reply-To: clive@cs.uq.oz.au
- Subject: WinAgent and its MIB Server
-
- A new kid on the block here just asking some simple questions.
-
- WinAgent.txt mentions that the MIB server can be bound to the CoreAgent in`
- one of two was, either via a dll or by shared memory and messages. What are
- the pros and cons of each method? Is there a best one?
-
- In the same document the MIB-server code is to be added. Has anyone got a
- basic example that I might learn from?
-
- Thanks for any help
- --
- Clive Mason _--_|\
- Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Queensland / X
- Queensland, Australia, 4072 \_.--._/
- clive@cs.uq.oz.au (ACSNET) v
- From news@bigblue.oit.unc.edu Sat Apr 16 19:43:45 1994
- Received: from bigblue.oit.unc.edu by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
- id AA23809; Sat, 16 Apr 1994 19:43:45 -0400
- Received: by bigblue.oit.unc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
- id AA22733; Sat, 16 Apr 1994 18:14:13 -0500
- Received: from GATEWAY by bigblue with netnews
- for winsock@sunsite.unc.edu (winsock@sunsite.unc.edu)
- To: winsock@sunsite.unc.edu
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 1994 13:30:10 UNDEFINED
- From: rhung@physics.ubc.ca (Ryan Hung)
- Message-Id: <rhung.45.008AAFA6@physics.ubc.ca>
- Organization: Physics, UBC
- Sender: ses
- References: <tmclaren.766350611@void>
- Subject: Re: NCSA Mosaic v2.0alpha4
-
- Well, here's my opinion of alpha 4. I've noticed that the status line (at the
- bottom) has changed (as of alpha 3) so that the byte count when transfering
- inlined images has been removed. This is not too good, as I run Trumpet
- Winsock over SLIP, and it helps to know, after waiting a while, whether a big
- inlined image is being transfered, or whether something went wrong. Also,
- I've found that with a document over 1 page in length, if one clicks on the
- scroll bar so as to scroll a whole page down, the text/images will often
- overlap on each other. That is, when paging down, the previous page will
- stay, and the next page is overlapped on top of the previous page. This
- actually started happening with alpha 3 too. Finally, while alpha2 wrote
- temporary images to the temp directory (specified by set temp=c:\temp) alpha4
- writes them to the mosaic directory, which is kinda annoying. Anybody else
- find these things?
-
- Ryan.
- | |The Enterprise going into warp? | My own words Copyright (C) 1994
- --O-- <--|Or a ship blowing up? Or a star? | Ryan Hung: rhung@physics.ubc.ca
- | |...Or just 2 |'s, 4 -'s, & an O? | or/XOR rwhung@netinfo.ubc.ca
- From news@bigblue.oit.unc.edu Sat Apr 16 19:43:48 1994
- Received: from bigblue.oit.unc.edu by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
- id AA23824; Sat, 16 Apr 1994 19:43:48 -0400
- Received: by bigblue.oit.unc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
- id AA17993; Sat, 16 Apr 1994 18:20:42 -0500
- Received: from GATEWAY by bigblue with netnews
- for winsock@sunsite.unc.edu (winsock@sunsite.unc.edu)
- To: winsock@sunsite.unc.edu
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 1994 15:45:04
- From: hpriest@orange.cc.utexas.edu (Jacob Childress)
- Message-Id: <hpriest.113.000FC0CA@utxvms.cc.utexas.edu>
- Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
- Sender: ses
- References: <tmclaren.766350611@void>, <1994Apr15.190200.3184@jwd.ping.de>, <2onlr9$2ah@linda.teleport.com>
- Subject: Swapfiles, was Re: NCSA Mosaic v2.0alpha4
-
- In article <2onlr9$2ah@linda.teleport.com> craign@teleport.com (Craig R. Nelson) writes:
-
- >Actually I have 64MB, but then again I always did overdo things. No,
- >you're not doing anything wrong. I do know that Win32s likes swapfiles.
- >Big ones. I run a temporary swap file on a 16MB RAM disk. It actually
- >works better then running with none at all (magnetic or otherwise).
-
- If you're the kind of guy with 64MB of RAM, then you're probably the kind of
- guy who knows what he's doing, so maybe you're doing what you're doing with
- your swapfile for a reason, but I just thought I'd point out that what you're
- doing is redundant (jeez what a sentence :)). You have your virtual memory in
- physical memory. That makes no sense. You're wasting RAM. Correct me if I'm
- wrong. :)
-
-
-